For the career writer,
"artist" or "entertainer" remains a perennial problem.
I use the term "artist"
to distinguish the most personal, creative goals of a writer. The "artist"
wants to tell the stories that the writer wants to tell, regardless of their
commercial viability or any other external value. Every writer has an "artist"
inside them.
The "entertainer" distinguishes
the writer's need to cater to her audience. The "entertainer" wants to be
loved, respected, valued and compensated. The "entertainer" wants to know
how her stories are being received by the audience, it's the ear that's
turned outward, listening for every laugh, titter, clap, sigh and boo from
beyond the footlights. Every writer has an "entertainer" inside them.
The conflict between
"artist" and "entertainer" represents a serious, ongoing emotional challenge
for the writer. I don't want to address this because it's too personal,
every writer is on his or her own journey and I'm not sure I could say anything
valuable.
I do want to address
the concrete, practical dilemmas that writers face around this issue.
First, let me sketch
for you the gospel of commercial publishing. I believe that what I'm about
to write plays into the goals of all the major publishers. I've heard it
from their lips many times and in my own analysis I see it in their behavior.
The chief goal of all
fiction publishers is what I would call "franchise publishing." They do
not want to publish one book by a writer. They do not want to publish a
number of very different books by a writer. Their ideal writer originates
a character, a voice or a fictional world so compelling that they create
a fan base for this entity. With this valuable entity now established, they
want the author to ride it as long and as deeply as possible. As a practical
matter, they are not interested in the artist, but the entertainer. Give
'em what they want is the motto here. Create a "franchise."
This worldview permeates
the philosophy of all genre publishing and reaches into the literary world
as well. Mystery publishing is a pristine example. Mysteries editors more
often buy series than "books." They believe it's so hard to establish a
writer, the initial shipments of the first book are so small, that they
must spread their risk and the authors chance, over a number of books. It
is a sound publishing philosophy. It's the single most important philosophy
out there. All writers must live with it, understand it, and even exploit
it for their own good. I am not writing to criticize this philosophy, but
to point out the conflicts it creates for the writer.
Franchise publishing
conflicts with the goals of the writer as artist. Let me share two specific
instances that brought this home for me for writers that I represent.
One writer is an up
and coming writer in a certain genre. She delivered a manuscript on spec
to her present publisher because the publisher wasn't happy with the original
outline and the publisher did have enough of her books accepted so that
they did not have to commission a book at that juncture. The writer went
forward with the book because it was important to her and felt creatively
that this was the book she needed to write. When completed, the publisher
wasn't really taken with the finished book.
This writer had previously
originated a fictional world that was quite successful. As it rejected the
spec manuscript, the publisher requested more books set in this world and
had been doing so for some time, making it clear they believed this was
the best way the author could advance her career. The author had already
sold them a few other books not set in this world, but remained convinced
that these books were the way to go. The author did have ready an outline
set in this fictional world and we did conclude a deal to write one additional
book in that universe. The advance we got was a substantial increase on
her previous advance and that increase did represent the publisher's belief
that books set in this universe were worth more than any other book the
author could write. The book that was rejected is being shopped elsewhere
and the author's dilemma remains in place. She wants to write the stories
she finds compelling, she also wants to succeed.
Another writer I represent
faced a similar dilemma recently, at a much earlier stage of his career.
He sold a first thriller for a modest advance to a good house that is publishing
it in hardcover. The opportunity is a good one. He delivered a new outline
for his second book, using different characters than the first book. Before
replying to the new outline, the editor asked us why the 2nd book did not
utilize the same characters from book one and was not set in the same universe.
The editor articulated the franchise publishing philosophy almost exactly
as I've described it in this article.
After some real soul
searching and even writing a second outline set in the original world, the
author decided to stick with the new outline with the new characters. We
received a modest offer for the second book and as of this writing, the
author has decided not to go under contract, choosing to write the second
book on spec. With publication a few months away and his own very serious
marketing plan in place, this author would rather wait and see if he can
establish himself at a level where he may have the freedom to write a second
book more of his own choosing or get a substantial advance based on the
success of the first book. He is also writing the new book, so when the
first book is published, he will be ready to contract for the second immediately
and be published one year later, not missing a turn. Authors are sometimes
given the advice to never write on spec. Here are two instances where it
seems to me, writing on spec was the right decision.
These are just two examples
in the real world of the real dilemmas writer's face. I wouldn't suggest
any hard and fast rules here. Franchise publishing is a legitimate goal
for any writer. Know yourself and think about your choices. Apprenticeships
are common in many businesses, accept the fact that you may have to write
a number of books as an entertainer to earn your shot as an artist. Don't
be afraid to dig in your heels either. You may have to switch or add a publishing
house or work under a pseudonym or find some other way to have certain of
your books published. I would encourage writers to be flexible enough to
work for love and money. Each demand sacrifice. Each has rewards. I never
advise writers to drop their favorite projects regardless of market conditions.
But if market conditions are unfavorable, you may have to live with an unpublished
manuscript.
This article originally
appeared in Novelists, Inc.